Every time you post a video you seem to be standing in an empty room
rehearsing an incredibly eloquent speech, yet there’s no one in that room
that gives a damn or will act upon anything you say regardless of how well
thought out or eloquent. If your objective is to make the changes you
advocate, why continue to act in a way that is clearly not successful at
achieving those objectives?
Few in the chamber understand what Daniel is saying not because of his
vocabulary but because they don’t want to understand. Our notions of
individual liberty get in the way.
True words. Also why Britain works best with its’ former colonies — from
Contracts and Torts to corporations law everything is smoother in our trade
and diplomacy, because we are similar in Law and share similar principles
regarding the application of the law to a given situation. As opposed to
the inquisitional system on the Continent.
All parliaments allow the backbenchers to state their opinions and concerns
on the record. Often this is done after the party heads have had their say
and have knocked off to lunch, which inevitably leads the vast majority of
MPs to leave as well. You only stay if you have something to say. This is
true of the US, the UK and elsewhere. Dan isn’t really speaking to the
other MEPs, he’s speaking to us. He’s using his 1 minute at the pulpit to
eloquently reach out to the masses.
He’s not talking to them, he’s talking to the internet. He and Farage must
have the widest audience of all MEPs I would guess. (Is that a pic of
bernanke?)
Yeap he should join UKIP
Every time you post a video you seem to be standing in an empty room
rehearsing an incredibly eloquent speech, yet there’s no one in that room
that gives a damn or will act upon anything you say regardless of how well
thought out or eloquent. If your objective is to make the changes you
advocate, why continue to act in a way that is clearly not successful at
achieving those objectives?
Few in the chamber understand what Daniel is saying not because of his
vocabulary but because they don’t want to understand. Our notions of
individual liberty get in the way.
Daniel uses so many long words noone in that room will understand the
translation.
True words. Also why Britain works best with its’ former colonies — from
Contracts and Torts to corporations law everything is smoother in our trade
and diplomacy, because we are similar in Law and share similar principles
regarding the application of the law to a given situation. As opposed to
the inquisitional system on the Continent.
Dan, I swear that if you were head of the Tory party, UKIP would not exist,
nor would it have to exist, nor would we care that it didn’t exist.
All parliaments allow the backbenchers to state their opinions and concerns
on the record. Often this is done after the party heads have had their say
and have knocked off to lunch, which inevitably leads the vast majority of
MPs to leave as well. You only stay if you have something to say. This is
true of the US, the UK and elsewhere. Dan isn’t really speaking to the
other MEPs, he’s speaking to us. He’s using his 1 minute at the pulpit to
eloquently reach out to the masses.
He’s not talking to them, he’s talking to the internet. He and Farage must
have the widest audience of all MEPs I would guess. (Is that a pic of
bernanke?)
Because someone needs to state it clearly and concisely. His opposition
also gives encouragement to other candidates and statesmen.