Caricato in data 03-marzo-2014 Uno scatto improvviso. IMMORTALA UN UFO. I fatti raccolti nel video sono tratti da molte fonti documentate. Video Rating: 3 / 5
Io penso che gli alieni esistono ma nn sn mai arrivati sulla terra! In caso
contrario avremo gia uficializzato la notizia! Poi x ke dovrebbero tenere
la notizia in segreto? Mah avranno I loro motivi….personalmente Nn credo
nei cosidetti UFO dischi volanti o roba simile..se qualcuno ci crede puo
pur crederci ms io nn ci credo.
su altri pianeti si è formata vita, ne abbiamo le prove, ma chi??? anch’io
penso che ci possa essere vita su altri pianeti ma in quanto a prove direi
che scarseggiano… e come è scritto nel video, questi sono tutti documenti
del gabinetto.
Io non capisco come qualcuno possa non credere alla esistenza degli alieni.
Se l’universo genera vita e noi ne siamo la prova lampante come si può
pensare che nell’immensità del cosmo il miracolo della vita non si sia
manifestato in altri luoghi se è successo qui perché non potrebbe succedere
altrove… Molti scienziati concordano nel dire che noi stessi siamo stati
creati da loro, del resto la scienza ufficiale non ha mai trovato la
congiunzione fra Homo di Neanderthal e Homo Sapiens ( cioè noi ).
Going past the speed of light happens in the center of the circle, as the
frequency becomes higher and higher as the circle of movement becomes
smaller. The outside zones maintain a lower frequency.
Now tell me, how come the WHOLE UFO disappears instead of just the center?
This proves that a little bit of knowledge is a very dangerous thing.
Transparent UFO’s that are hundreds of miles in diameter, I think not……
I suggest that you keep studying optics…. Just saying….
Why do all the tops face us, is what I would love to know? All the tops of
the discs? You do not see them rotating spinning around revealing angles.
Looking at the side of a galaxy would show a sombrero looking thing or even
an eye.
OK IM NO SCIENTIST PEOPLE ARE SAYING ALL THESE PARTICLES THAT APPEAR OUT OF
NOWHERE AFTER TETHER BREAKS ARE OPTICAL ILLUSIONS HOW COME THEY DIDNT
APPEAR BEFORE THE TETHER BROKE ? ALSO HOW COME THEY ALL APPEARED AT THE
EXACT SAME TIME AS EACH OTHER ? I REST MY CASE I THANK YOU
«There is no concrete evidence of the discs’ existence».
«It has been claimed that Tsum Um Nui is not a real Chinese name. There is
no mention of him in China outside his connection to the Dropa stones.
According to Dropa enthusiast Hartwig Hausdorf, Tsum Um Nui is a «former
Japanese name, but adapted to Chinese language». Nor is there any mention
in any records about Chi Pu Tei’s expedition in 1938.
Sungods in Exile, with its account of Dr. Karyl Robin-Evans in all
appearances gave credibility to Dropa stones until 1988, when David A.
Gamon told Fortean Times magazine that THE BOOK WAS FICTION and Dr. Karyl
Robin-Evans imaginary.
The stone discs were supposedly stored in various museums across China.
However, none of these museums have any records or traces of Dropa stone
ever being there.
According to the Gould-Parkinson system of transliteration, «Drop-ka» is
Tibetan for «solitude» or «inhabitant of pasture lands». It is said to be
the name of a tribe of Tibetan nomadic herders on the eastern Tibetan
plateau».
Light has no mass and no charge. Since it has no mass it cannot be affected
by gravity and with no charge it cannot be affected by magnetism. (even
though it is referred to as electro-magnetic.) What would have to happen is
a change in spacetime, like a warping or rather a vortex in the torsion
field. This guy may be describing a black hole but in a reverse logic. Like
saying which came first the chicken or the egg.
Stop flogging that well dead horse of the tether UFOs. David Sereda has
just put aload of old discounted nonsense together. Just writing on a
blackboard wont get you a Phd and wont prove your theories. He wont be
getting a Nobel prize anytime soon. Total crap like this only messes up
REAL UFO research.
The tether footage has been satisfactorily reproduced and shown to be
near-lens debris, that appear to go behind because the tether itself is in
such high contrast, also the notch in the disk has been shown to be an
artifact caused by the focus mechanism inside the camera. The key test is
not in any way an acceptable reproduction. There is a lot of STS footage
that is far harder to explain however.
Was interested until the keys in front of the camera test. CCD’s and CMOS
chips act as film, they convert photons in to digital signal binary. It’s
what the lens is doing that makes the difference. The reason the keys are
in focus and the tree, all be it only just in focus, is because the
aperture of the camera would have been low. Had you used a high aperture
and used an ND filter to decrease the amount of light, you would not be
able to focus on the keys and the trees at the same time.
Finally someone post a video about the fact that these things are not UFO’s
I for one would only have believed them to be UFO’s if they had done what a
simple fish would have done. Even a simple fish in a fish tank would have
not kept going in straight lines past a new object in the tank but instead
would have circled it and nipped at it. I see nothing here but dust in
space that somehow has been imaged by the camera in a way to make the dust
particles seem as if they are floating behind the tether. A FISH with less
brains probably less than an ANT would have investigated the object and
circled it or something instead of just keep passing the object in straight
lines, and ALIENS are suppose to be smart, or very, very smart, at least
smarter that your average FISH. If you have seen other videos where a orb
does a U-turn or arcs across the screen then maybe that is a true UFO, but
when you see UFO’s just going in straight lines in opposing directions or
Multiple directions then consider this. The Space that we have in and
around the immediate area of our Earth is filled with so much dust from
passing comets and asteroids and space junk and all sorts of other stuff
and when we see that kind of debris it tends to travel in only one
direction. YES there are aliens and alien craft from these aliens but these
are not them. Thx for posting the truth once and for all.
looks like something you would find in the ocean, like jelly fish or amoeba
of some type. As for size I don’t know but the shapes seem to act like sea
creatures to me.
its all about molecules… all these things are so true!!!!I understand
why, we don’t see the future changing because of men and or Ets, advanced
humans so experienced in how they navigate via time conduits etc. speeding
up so fast, if mass slows down the faster it goes? then opposite must
happen as molecules speed up the smaller the energy spiraling inwardly ad
infinitum.
… when the keys (at 12:45) come into focus, the background blurs — even
easy to see on this highly compressed youtube video. Repeating things which
are wrong does not make them right.
Whatever. Its what they say is true, not what your eyes tell you its true.
we are not suposed to ask questions. so if they say its dirt, its dirt.
just like wtc 7 was braught down by depris from the tt`s not by controlled
demolition. and now go back to work and pay your tax. don´t ask questions
kettle. thats not your job. we hve great siencists who tell you what to
believe. ok?
Ultimo avvistamento ufo
Io penso che gli alieni esistono ma nn sn mai arrivati sulla terra! In caso
contrario avremo gia uficializzato la notizia! Poi x ke dovrebbero tenere
la notizia in segreto? Mah avranno I loro motivi….personalmente Nn credo
nei cosidetti UFO dischi volanti o roba simile..se qualcuno ci crede puo
pur crederci ms io nn ci credo.
su altri pianeti si è formata vita, ne abbiamo le prove, ma chi??? anch’io
penso che ci possa essere vita su altri pianeti ma in quanto a prove direi
che scarseggiano… e come è scritto nel video, questi sono tutti documenti
del gabinetto.
Io non capisco come qualcuno possa non credere alla esistenza degli alieni.
Se l’universo genera vita e noi ne siamo la prova lampante come si può
pensare che nell’immensità del cosmo il miracolo della vita non si sia
manifestato in altri luoghi se è successo qui perché non potrebbe succedere
altrove… Molti scienziati concordano nel dire che noi stessi siamo stati
creati da loro, del resto la scienza ufficiale non ha mai trovato la
congiunzione fra Homo di Neanderthal e Homo Sapiens ( cioè noi ).
dove l hai trovata
comesi chiama la 2 canzone
This theory has one HUGE FLAW:
Going past the speed of light happens in the center of the circle, as the
frequency becomes higher and higher as the circle of movement becomes
smaller. The outside zones maintain a lower frequency.
Now tell me, how come the WHOLE UFO disappears instead of just the center?
This proves that a little bit of knowledge is a very dangerous thing.
Transparent UFO’s that are hundreds of miles in diameter, I think not……
I suggest that you keep studying optics…. Just saying….
David is cool but i think instead of planting trees he should of gone to
college…his theories sometimes are a reach
wonder what happen to the tether if they got it back or just left it
floating in space forever
Why do all the tops face us, is what I would love to know? All the tops of
the discs? You do not see them rotating spinning around revealing angles.
Looking at the side of a galaxy would show a sombrero looking thing or even
an eye.
I wouldn’t put this kid near a glory hole armed with a permanent marker.
OK IM NO SCIENTIST PEOPLE ARE SAYING ALL THESE PARTICLES THAT APPEAR OUT OF
NOWHERE AFTER TETHER BREAKS ARE OPTICAL ILLUSIONS HOW COME THEY DIDNT
APPEAR BEFORE THE TETHER BROKE ? ALSO HOW COME THEY ALL APPEARED AT THE
EXACT SAME TIME AS EACH OTHER ? I REST MY CASE I THANK YOU
DROPA STONES A BUNCH OF BS…
«There is no concrete evidence of the discs’ existence».
«It has been claimed that Tsum Um Nui is not a real Chinese name. There is
no mention of him in China outside his connection to the Dropa stones.
According to Dropa enthusiast Hartwig Hausdorf, Tsum Um Nui is a «former
Japanese name, but adapted to Chinese language». Nor is there any mention
in any records about Chi Pu Tei’s expedition in 1938.
Sungods in Exile, with its account of Dr. Karyl Robin-Evans in all
appearances gave credibility to Dropa stones until 1988, when David A.
Gamon told Fortean Times magazine that THE BOOK WAS FICTION and Dr. Karyl
Robin-Evans imaginary.
The stone discs were supposedly stored in various museums across China.
However, none of these museums have any records or traces of Dropa stone
ever being there.
According to the Gould-Parkinson system of transliteration, «Drop-ka» is
Tibetan for «solitude» or «inhabitant of pasture lands». It is said to be
the name of a tribe of Tibetan nomadic herders on the eastern Tibetan
plateau».
Light has no mass and no charge. Since it has no mass it cannot be affected
by gravity and with no charge it cannot be affected by magnetism. (even
though it is referred to as electro-magnetic.) What would have to happen is
a change in spacetime, like a warping or rather a vortex in the torsion
field. This guy may be describing a black hole but in a reverse logic. Like
saying which came first the chicken or the egg.
Stop flogging that well dead horse of the tether UFOs. David Sereda has
just put aload of old discounted nonsense together. Just writing on a
blackboard wont get you a Phd and wont prove your theories. He wont be
getting a Nobel prize anytime soon. Total crap like this only messes up
REAL UFO research.
The tether footage has been satisfactorily reproduced and shown to be
near-lens debris, that appear to go behind because the tether itself is in
such high contrast, also the notch in the disk has been shown to be an
artifact caused by the focus mechanism inside the camera. The key test is
not in any way an acceptable reproduction. There is a lot of STS footage
that is far harder to explain however.
Was interested until the keys in front of the camera test. CCD’s and CMOS
chips act as film, they convert photons in to digital signal binary. It’s
what the lens is doing that makes the difference. The reason the keys are
in focus and the tree, all be it only just in focus, is because the
aperture of the camera would have been low. Had you used a high aperture
and used an ND filter to decrease the amount of light, you would not be
able to focus on the keys and the trees at the same time.
So?…..oO
Finally someone post a video about the fact that these things are not UFO’s
I for one would only have believed them to be UFO’s if they had done what a
simple fish would have done. Even a simple fish in a fish tank would have
not kept going in straight lines past a new object in the tank but instead
would have circled it and nipped at it. I see nothing here but dust in
space that somehow has been imaged by the camera in a way to make the dust
particles seem as if they are floating behind the tether. A FISH with less
brains probably less than an ANT would have investigated the object and
circled it or something instead of just keep passing the object in straight
lines, and ALIENS are suppose to be smart, or very, very smart, at least
smarter that your average FISH. If you have seen other videos where a orb
does a U-turn or arcs across the screen then maybe that is a true UFO, but
when you see UFO’s just going in straight lines in opposing directions or
Multiple directions then consider this. The Space that we have in and
around the immediate area of our Earth is filled with so much dust from
passing comets and asteroids and space junk and all sorts of other stuff
and when we see that kind of debris it tends to travel in only one
direction. YES there are aliens and alien craft from these aliens but these
are not them. Thx for posting the truth once and for all.
your key experiment is not exact. the space particles are bathed in
sunlight while your keys are in shadows.
Who is the 12 year-old narrator? YouTube is disappointing.
ET has a message for us all:
https://cognizantnationhq.weebly.com/1/post/2014/02/the-alien-agenda-for-planet-earth.html
looks like something you would find in the ocean, like jelly fish or amoeba
of some type. As for size I don’t know but the shapes seem to act like sea
creatures to me.
people with an IQ of 10 will enjoy this….
its all about molecules… all these things are so true!!!!I understand
why, we don’t see the future changing because of men and or Ets, advanced
humans so experienced in how they navigate via time conduits etc. speeding
up so fast, if mass slows down the faster it goes? then opposite must
happen as molecules speed up the smaller the energy spiraling inwardly ad
infinitum.
… when the keys (at 12:45) come into focus, the background blurs — even
easy to see on this highly compressed youtube video. Repeating things which
are wrong does not make them right.
Dumb-ass! Get a Spirograph™ and then lets see the crap you spew.
Whatever. Its what they say is true, not what your eyes tell you its true.
we are not suposed to ask questions. so if they say its dirt, its dirt.
just like wtc 7 was braught down by depris from the tt`s not by controlled
demolition. and now go back to work and pay your tax. don´t ask questions
kettle. thats not your job. we hve great siencists who tell you what to
believe. ok?
NASA was just testing them all
NASA is in front of this
You lost me. I thought I knew you,but I don’t.